Connect with us

World news

What Does the New Russian Interference Report Tell Us About Hunter Biden’s Laptop?

Published

on

It remains one of the oddest stories of the 2020 election cycle: In mid-October, the New York Post reported that it had obtained a series of emails from a laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden, the son of the then-presidential candidate. The emails included what appeared to be various damning revelations about the younger Biden’s business ties, as well as his drug use, including one email in which a Ukrainian energy executive appeared to thank Hunter Biden for arranging an introduction to his father.

The laptop made news for several reasons—social media sites blocked links to the story, with the explanation that it may have come from hacked materials, as associates of then-President Trump were known to be actively digging up dirt on the younger Biden’s Ukraine ties.

Then, a strange story emerged about how the laptop came to fall into the newspaper’s hands, with a Delaware computer shop owner admitting that he gave it to Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani. This, in turn, led to some hilarious Yelp reviews for the computer store. The computer shop owner, meanwhile, went on to sue Twitter for defamation, to the tune of $500 million.

Months later, with Joseph Biden now in the White House, there’s been little clarity as to the laptop story, although Hunter Biden did admit in December that he is under investigation for issues related to his taxes. But it remains unknown exactly what role Russia played in the laptop affair.

That is, until Wednesday, when the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a report laying out the Intelligence Community’s assessment of attempts at foreign interference in the 2020 election. The report was the declassified version of a report presented to the president and Congressional leadership back in January.

The report concluded that while there was no successful interference with the voting itself, Russia did indeed interfere with the election once again, while Iran did as well. Some other foreign nations, including Cuba, Venezuela, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah faction, also made small-scale attempts at interference. China, meanwhile, did not.

But the “main event” of the report, as in 2016, was the Russian interference.

“We assess that Russian President Putin authorized, and a range for Russian government organizations conducted, influence operations aimed at denigrating President Biden’s candidacy, and the Democratic Party, supporting former President Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral processes and exacerbating sociopolitical divisions in the U.S.” The judgment went on to say that “unlike in 2016, we did not see persistent Russian cyber efforts to gain access to election infrastructure.”

The ODNI went on to say that “we have high confidence in our assessment.” But the usual caveats apply that this is an intelligence assessment, and not an assertion of absolutely certain truth. Such assessments have been wrong before.

In the following paragraph, the report stated that “a key element to Moscow’s strategy this election cycle was it’s use of proxies linked to Russian intelligence to push influence narratives – including misleading or unsubstantiated allegations against President Biden – to U.S. media organizations, U.S. officials, and prominent U.S. individuals, including some close to former President Trump and his administration.”

The report goes on to state that specifically named “Ukraine-linked individuals,” including Russian agent Konstanin Kilimnik and Andriy Derkach, “sought to use prominent U.S. persons and media conduits to launder their narratives to U.S. officials and audiences,” and that “these Russian proxies met with and provided materials to Trump administration-linked U.S. persons to advocate for formal investigations.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *